| 1 | package agent |
| 2 | |
| 3 | import ( |
| 4 | "context" |
| 5 | "encoding/json" |
| 6 | "fmt" |
| 7 | "reasonix/internal/event" |
| 8 | "strings" |
| 9 | "testing" |
| 10 | |
| 11 | "reasonix/internal/provider" |
| 12 | "reasonix/internal/tool" |
| 13 | ) |
| 14 | |
| 15 | // mockProvider replays preset chunks and records the last request it received. |
| 16 | type mockProvider struct { |
| 17 | name string |
| 18 | chunks []provider.Chunk |
| 19 | streams [][]provider.Chunk |
| 20 | lastReq provider.Request |
| 21 | requests []provider.Request |
| 22 | } |
| 23 | |
| 24 | func (m *mockProvider) Name() string { return m.name } |
| 25 | |
| 26 | func (m *mockProvider) Stream(ctx context.Context, req provider.Request) (<-chan provider.Chunk, error) { |
| 27 | m.lastReq = req |
| 28 | call := len(m.requests) |
| 29 | m.requests = append(m.requests, req) |
| 30 | chunks := m.chunks |
| 31 | if len(m.streams) > 0 { |
| 32 | if call >= len(m.streams) { |
| 33 | call = len(m.streams) - 1 |
| 34 | } |
| 35 | chunks = m.streams[call] |
| 36 | } |
| 37 | ch := make(chan provider.Chunk, len(chunks)) |
| 38 | for _, c := range chunks { |
| 39 | ch <- c |
| 40 | } |
| 41 | close(ch) |
| 42 | return ch, nil |
| 43 | } |
| 44 | |
| 45 | func lastUser(req provider.Request) string { |
| 46 | for i := len(req.Messages) - 1; i >= 0; i-- { |
| 47 | if req.Messages[i].Role == provider.RoleUser { |
| 48 | return req.Messages[i].Content |
| 49 | } |
| 50 | } |
| 51 | return "" |
| 52 | } |
| 53 | |
| 54 | // TestCoordinatorHandsPlanToExecutor checks the two-session handoff: the planner |
| 55 | // sees the raw task in its own session, and the executor receives the plan. |
| 56 | func TestCoordinatorHandsPlanToExecutor(t *testing.T) { |
| 57 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 58 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. read main.go\n2. fix the loop"}, |
| 59 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 60 | }} |
| 61 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 62 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 63 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 64 | }} |
| 65 | |
| 66 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 67 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 68 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, plannerSess, nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 69 | |
| 70 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 71 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 72 | } |
| 73 | |
| 74 | if got := lastUser(planner.lastReq); !strings.Contains(got, "fix the bug") { |
| 75 | t.Errorf("planner saw user %q, want it to contain the task", got) |
| 76 | } |
| 77 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "read main.go") || !strings.Contains(got, "fix the bug") || !strings.Contains(got, "You are the executor now") { |
| 78 | t.Errorf("executor saw user %q, want task + plan", got) |
| 79 | } |
| 80 | // planner session must accumulate (system, user, assistant-plan) so its |
| 81 | // prefix grows prepend-only and stays cache-stable. |
| 82 | if n := len(plannerSess.Messages); n != 3 { |
| 83 | t.Errorf("planner session has %d messages, want 3", n) |
| 84 | } |
| 85 | } |
| 86 | |
| 87 | type coordinatorApprovalGate struct { |
| 88 | calls int |
| 89 | allow bool |
| 90 | } |
| 91 | |
| 92 | func (g *coordinatorApprovalGate) RunWithPlannerApproval(ctx context.Context, _ string, run func(context.Context) error) error { |
| 93 | g.calls++ |
| 94 | if !g.allow { |
| 95 | return nil |
| 96 | } |
| 97 | return run(ctx) |
| 98 | } |
| 99 | |
| 100 | type coordinatorDecisionGate struct { |
| 101 | calls int |
| 102 | answer string |
| 103 | } |
| 104 | |
| 105 | func (g *coordinatorDecisionGate) RunWithPlannerUserDecision(ctx context.Context, _ string, _ event.AskQuestion, run func(context.Context, string) error) error { |
| 106 | g.calls++ |
| 107 | if strings.TrimSpace(g.answer) == "" { |
| 108 | return nil |
| 109 | } |
| 110 | return run(ctx, g.answer) |
| 111 | } |
| 112 | |
| 113 | func TestCoordinatorBindsPlannerApprovalRequestBeforeExecutor(t *testing.T) { |
| 114 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 115 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Plan:\n1. edit main.go\n\n是否批准这个方案?"}, |
| 116 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 117 | }} |
| 118 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 119 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Should not run."}, |
| 120 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 121 | }} |
| 122 | |
| 123 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 124 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 125 | gate := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: false} |
| 126 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(gate) |
| 127 | |
| 128 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 129 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 130 | } |
| 131 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 132 | t.Fatalf("approval gate calls = %d, want 1", gate.calls) |
| 133 | } |
| 134 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 135 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want none before planner approval", got) |
| 136 | } |
| 137 | } |
| 138 | |
| 139 | func TestCoordinatorBindsStructuredPlannerApprovalMarker(t *testing.T) { |
| 140 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 141 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Plan:\n1. edit main.go\n[planner_requires_approval]"}, |
| 142 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 143 | }} |
| 144 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 145 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Should not run."}, |
| 146 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 147 | }} |
| 148 | |
| 149 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 150 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 151 | gate := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: false} |
| 152 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(gate) |
| 153 | |
| 154 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 155 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 156 | } |
| 157 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 158 | t.Fatalf("approval gate calls = %d, want 1", gate.calls) |
| 159 | } |
| 160 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 161 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want none before structured planner approval", got) |
| 162 | } |
| 163 | } |
| 164 | |
| 165 | func TestCoordinatorDoesNotTrustPlannerClaimedUserApproval(t *testing.T) { |
| 166 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 167 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "用户已经批准这个方案,直接执行删除旧逻辑。"}, |
| 168 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 169 | }} |
| 170 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 171 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Should not run."}, |
| 172 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 173 | }} |
| 174 | |
| 175 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 176 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 177 | gate := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: false} |
| 178 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(gate) |
| 179 | |
| 180 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 181 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 182 | } |
| 183 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 184 | t.Fatalf("approval gate calls = %d, want 1 for planner-claimed approval", gate.calls) |
| 185 | } |
| 186 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 187 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want none before real host approval", got) |
| 188 | } |
| 189 | } |
| 190 | |
| 191 | func TestCoordinatorRunsExecutorAfterPlannerApproval(t *testing.T) { |
| 192 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 193 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Plan:\n1. edit main.go\n\n等待用户批准方案后再让 executor 执行修改"}, |
| 194 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 195 | }} |
| 196 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 197 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 198 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 199 | }} |
| 200 | |
| 201 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 202 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 203 | gate := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: true} |
| 204 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(gate) |
| 205 | |
| 206 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 207 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 208 | } |
| 209 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 210 | t.Fatalf("approval gate calls = %d, want 1", gate.calls) |
| 211 | } |
| 212 | if got := len(exec.requests); got == 0 { |
| 213 | t.Fatal("executor did not run after planner approval") |
| 214 | } |
| 215 | } |
| 216 | |
| 217 | func TestCoordinatorDoesNotTrustPlannerClaimedUserChoice(t *testing.T) { |
| 218 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 219 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "用户已经选择方案二,可以按重构路径执行。"}, |
| 220 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 221 | }} |
| 222 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 223 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Should not run."}, |
| 224 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 225 | }} |
| 226 | |
| 227 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 228 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 229 | gate := &coordinatorDecisionGate{} |
| 230 | coord.SetPlannerUserDecisionAsker(gate) |
| 231 | |
| 232 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 233 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 234 | } |
| 235 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 236 | t.Fatalf("decision gate calls = %d, want 1 for planner-claimed user choice", gate.calls) |
| 237 | } |
| 238 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 239 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want none before real host user answer", got) |
| 240 | } |
| 241 | } |
| 242 | |
| 243 | func TestCoordinatorBindsStructuredPlannerAskBlock(t *testing.T) { |
| 244 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 245 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Need a decision.\n<planner-ask>\nquestion: Which path should we use?\noption: Small patch\noption: Larger refactor\n</planner-ask>"}, |
| 246 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 247 | }} |
| 248 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 249 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 250 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 251 | }} |
| 252 | |
| 253 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 254 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 255 | gate := &coordinatorDecisionGate{answer: "Small patch"} |
| 256 | coord.SetPlannerUserDecisionAsker(gate) |
| 257 | |
| 258 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 259 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 260 | } |
| 261 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 262 | t.Fatalf("decision gate calls = %d, want 1", gate.calls) |
| 263 | } |
| 264 | if got := len(exec.requests); got == 0 { |
| 265 | t.Fatal("executor did not run after structured planner ask answer") |
| 266 | } |
| 267 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "Host user answer to planner question") || !strings.Contains(got, "Small patch") { |
| 268 | t.Fatalf("executor handoff missing structured host answer:\n%s", got) |
| 269 | } |
| 270 | } |
| 271 | |
| 272 | func TestCoordinatorBindsPlannerUserDecisionBeforeExecutor(t *testing.T) { |
| 273 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 274 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "需要用户选择方案:\n方案一:小改当前逻辑\n方案二:重构控制流\n请选择哪个方案。"}, |
| 275 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 276 | }} |
| 277 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 278 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Should not run."}, |
| 279 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 280 | }} |
| 281 | |
| 282 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 283 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 284 | gate := &coordinatorDecisionGate{} |
| 285 | coord.SetPlannerUserDecisionAsker(gate) |
| 286 | |
| 287 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 288 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 289 | } |
| 290 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 291 | t.Fatalf("decision gate calls = %d, want 1", gate.calls) |
| 292 | } |
| 293 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 294 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want none before user decision", got) |
| 295 | } |
| 296 | } |
| 297 | |
| 298 | func TestCoordinatorDoesNotAskForOrdinaryPlanVerificationWording(t *testing.T) { |
| 299 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 300 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Plan:\n1. 确认文件存在\n2. 修改 main.go\n3. 运行测试"}, |
| 301 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 302 | }} |
| 303 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 304 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 305 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 306 | }} |
| 307 | |
| 308 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 309 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 310 | gate := &coordinatorDecisionGate{answer: "should not be used"} |
| 311 | coord.SetPlannerUserDecisionAsker(gate) |
| 312 | |
| 313 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 314 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 315 | } |
| 316 | if gate.calls != 0 { |
| 317 | t.Fatalf("decision gate calls = %d, want no AskRequest for ordinary verification wording", gate.calls) |
| 318 | } |
| 319 | if got := len(exec.requests); got == 0 { |
| 320 | t.Fatal("executor should run for ordinary plan wording") |
| 321 | } |
| 322 | } |
| 323 | |
| 324 | func TestCoordinatorPassesHostUserDecisionToExecutor(t *testing.T) { |
| 325 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 326 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "需要用户选择方案:\n方案一:小改当前逻辑\n方案二:重构控制流\n请选择哪个方案。"}, |
| 327 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 328 | }} |
| 329 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 330 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 331 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 332 | }} |
| 333 | |
| 334 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 335 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 336 | gate := &coordinatorDecisionGate{answer: "方案二:重构控制流"} |
| 337 | coord.SetPlannerUserDecisionAsker(gate) |
| 338 | |
| 339 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 340 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 341 | } |
| 342 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 343 | t.Fatalf("decision gate calls = %d, want 1", gate.calls) |
| 344 | } |
| 345 | if got := len(exec.requests); got == 0 { |
| 346 | t.Fatal("executor did not run after user decision") |
| 347 | } |
| 348 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "Host user answer to planner question") || !strings.Contains(got, "方案二") { |
| 349 | t.Fatalf("executor handoff missing host user answer:\n%s", got) |
| 350 | } |
| 351 | } |
| 352 | |
| 353 | // TestHandoffTaskRecoversOriginalInput guards the dual-model auto-title path |
| 354 | // (#3860): previews must surface the user's words, not handoff boilerplate. |
| 355 | func TestHandoffTaskRecoversOriginalInput(t *testing.T) { |
| 356 | if got := HandoffTask(formatHandoff("修复登录页的 bug", "1. read login.go")); got != "修复登录页的 bug" { |
| 357 | t.Errorf("HandoffTask(handoff) = %q, want the original task", got) |
| 358 | } |
| 359 | multi := "fix the bug\n\nsteps:\n- a\n- b" |
| 360 | if got := HandoffTask(formatHandoff(multi, "plan")); got != multi { |
| 361 | t.Errorf("HandoffTask(multi-line) = %q, want %q", got, multi) |
| 362 | } |
| 363 | for _, plain := range []string{"ordinary input", "", "# Reasonix executor handoff with no sections"} { |
| 364 | if got := HandoffTask(plain); got != plain { |
| 365 | t.Errorf("HandoffTask(%q) = %q, want unchanged", plain, got) |
| 366 | } |
| 367 | } |
| 368 | } |
| 369 | |
| 370 | // TestCoordinatorSkipsPlannerForTrivialTurn checks the gate: when shouldPlan |
| 371 | // rejects the turn, the planner is never called and the executor gets the raw |
| 372 | // input (no plan handoff). |
| 373 | func TestCoordinatorSkipsPlannerForTrivialTurn(t *testing.T) { |
| 374 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner"} |
| 375 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 376 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "It does X."}, |
| 377 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 378 | }} |
| 379 | |
| 380 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 381 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 382 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, plannerSess, nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, func(context.Context, string) bool { return false }) |
| 383 | |
| 384 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "what does this function do?"); err != nil { |
| 385 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 386 | } |
| 387 | |
| 388 | if planner.lastReq.Messages != nil { |
| 389 | t.Error("planner should not be called for a skipped turn") |
| 390 | } |
| 391 | if got := lastUser(exec.lastReq); got != "what does this function do?" { |
| 392 | t.Errorf("executor saw %q, want the raw input with no plan handoff", got) |
| 393 | } |
| 394 | if n := len(plannerSess.Messages); n != 1 { // just the system message |
| 395 | t.Errorf("planner session has %d messages, want 1 (untouched)", n) |
| 396 | } |
| 397 | } |
| 398 | |
| 399 | func TestCoordinatorStructuredPolicyUsesStableDepthMetadata(t *testing.T) { |
| 400 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 401 | {{Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Light plan."}, {Type: provider.ChunkDone}}, |
| 402 | {{Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Full plan."}, {Type: provider.ChunkDone}}, |
| 403 | }} |
| 404 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 405 | {{Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Light done."}, {Type: provider.ChunkDone}}, |
| 406 | {{Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Full done."}, {Type: provider.ChunkDone}}, |
| 407 | }} |
| 408 | policy := func(_ context.Context, input string) PlannerDecision { |
| 409 | if strings.Contains(input, "light") { |
| 410 | return PlannerDecision{ |
| 411 | Route: PlannerRoutePlanAndExecute, Depth: PlannerDepthLight, |
| 412 | Reason: "test_light", MaxResearchRounds: 2, |
| 413 | } |
| 414 | } |
| 415 | return PlannerDecision{ |
| 416 | Route: PlannerRoutePlanAndExecute, Depth: PlannerDepthFull, |
| 417 | Reason: "test_full", MaxResearchRounds: 6, |
| 418 | } |
| 419 | } |
| 420 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 421 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 422 | planner, NewSession("stable planner system"), nil, nil, Options{}, |
| 423 | executor, 0, event.Discard, policy, |
| 424 | ) |
| 425 | |
| 426 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "light task"); err != nil { |
| 427 | t.Fatalf("light Run: %v", err) |
| 428 | } |
| 429 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "full task"); err != nil { |
| 430 | t.Fatalf("full Run: %v", err) |
| 431 | } |
| 432 | |
| 433 | if got := lastUser(planner.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "depth: light") || !strings.Contains(got, "route: plan_and_execute") { |
| 434 | t.Fatalf("light planner input missing route metadata: %q", got) |
| 435 | } |
| 436 | if got := lastUser(planner.requests[1]); !strings.Contains(got, "depth: full") || !strings.Contains(got, "route: plan_and_execute") { |
| 437 | t.Fatalf("full planner input missing route metadata: %q", got) |
| 438 | } |
| 439 | for i, req := range planner.requests { |
| 440 | if len(req.Messages) == 0 || req.Messages[0].Role != provider.RoleSystem || req.Messages[0].Content != "stable planner system" { |
| 441 | t.Fatalf("planner request %d changed stable system prefix: %+v", i, req.Messages) |
| 442 | } |
| 443 | } |
| 444 | var handoffs []string |
| 445 | for _, req := range exec.requests { |
| 446 | if got := lastUser(req); strings.Contains(got, executorHandoffMarker) { |
| 447 | handoffs = append(handoffs, got) |
| 448 | } |
| 449 | } |
| 450 | if len(handoffs) != 2 { |
| 451 | t.Fatalf("executor handoffs = %d, want one light and one full handoff", len(handoffs)) |
| 452 | } |
| 453 | if !strings.Contains(handoffs[0], "Planning depth: light") { |
| 454 | t.Fatalf("light handoff missing depth: %q", handoffs[0]) |
| 455 | } |
| 456 | if !strings.Contains(handoffs[1], "Planning depth: full") { |
| 457 | t.Fatalf("full handoff missing depth: %q", handoffs[1]) |
| 458 | } |
| 459 | } |
| 460 | |
| 461 | func TestCoordinatorPlanForApprovalDoesNotDependOnPlannerMarker(t *testing.T) { |
| 462 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 463 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. inspect auth\n2. migrate tokens"}, |
| 464 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 465 | }} |
| 466 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 467 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "must not run"}, |
| 468 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 469 | }} |
| 470 | policy := func(context.Context, string) PlannerDecision { |
| 471 | return PlannerDecision{ |
| 472 | Route: PlannerRoutePlanForApproval, Depth: PlannerDepthFull, |
| 473 | Reason: "user_plan_for_approval", MaxResearchRounds: 6, |
| 474 | } |
| 475 | } |
| 476 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 477 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 478 | planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, |
| 479 | executor, 0, event.Discard, policy, |
| 480 | ) |
| 481 | approval := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: false} |
| 482 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(approval) |
| 483 | |
| 484 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "plan auth migration first"); err != nil { |
| 485 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 486 | } |
| 487 | if approval.calls != 1 { |
| 488 | t.Fatalf("approval calls = %d, want 1 without planner marker", approval.calls) |
| 489 | } |
| 490 | if len(exec.requests) != 0 { |
| 491 | t.Fatal("executor ran before structured plan approval") |
| 492 | } |
| 493 | } |
| 494 | |
| 495 | func TestCoordinatorPlanForApprovalHandsOffAfterApproval(t *testing.T) { |
| 496 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 497 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. inspect auth\n2. migrate tokens"}, |
| 498 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 499 | }} |
| 500 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 501 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 502 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 503 | }} |
| 504 | policy := func(context.Context, string) PlannerDecision { |
| 505 | return PlannerDecision{Route: PlannerRoutePlanForApproval, Depth: PlannerDepthFull, Reason: "user_plan_for_approval"} |
| 506 | } |
| 507 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 508 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 509 | planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, |
| 510 | executor, 0, event.Discard, policy, |
| 511 | ) |
| 512 | approval := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: true} |
| 513 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(approval) |
| 514 | |
| 515 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "plan auth migration, then wait for my approval"); err != nil { |
| 516 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 517 | } |
| 518 | if approval.calls != 1 { |
| 519 | t.Fatalf("approval calls = %d, want 1", approval.calls) |
| 520 | } |
| 521 | if len(exec.requests) == 0 { |
| 522 | t.Fatal("executor did not run after approval") |
| 523 | } |
| 524 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "migrate tokens") { |
| 525 | t.Fatalf("executor handoff = %q, want approved planner output", got) |
| 526 | } |
| 527 | } |
| 528 | |
| 529 | func TestCoordinatorHeadlessPlanForApprovalPersistsForContinuation(t *testing.T) { |
| 530 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 531 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. inspect auth\n2. migrate tokens"}, |
| 532 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 533 | }} |
| 534 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 535 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "must not run"}, |
| 536 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 537 | }} |
| 538 | policy := func(context.Context, string) PlannerDecision { |
| 539 | return PlannerDecision{Route: PlannerRoutePlanForApproval, Depth: PlannerDepthFull, Reason: "user_plan_for_approval"} |
| 540 | } |
| 541 | sink := &recordSink{} |
| 542 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, sink) |
| 543 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 544 | planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, |
| 545 | executor, 0, sink, policy, |
| 546 | ) |
| 547 | |
| 548 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "plan auth migration first"); err != nil { |
| 549 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 550 | } |
| 551 | if len(exec.requests) != 0 { |
| 552 | t.Fatal("headless executor ran without a plan approval channel") |
| 553 | } |
| 554 | msgs := executor.Session().Messages |
| 555 | if len(msgs) < 2 || !strings.Contains(msgs[len(msgs)-1].Content, plannerPlanAwaitingApprovalNote) { |
| 556 | t.Fatalf("headless approval turn was not persisted for continuation: %+v", msgs) |
| 557 | } |
| 558 | } |
| 559 | |
| 560 | func TestCoordinatorPlanOnlyDoesNotRunExecutor(t *testing.T) { |
| 561 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 562 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. inspect auth\n2. migrate tokens"}, |
| 563 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 564 | }} |
| 565 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 566 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "must not run"}, |
| 567 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 568 | }} |
| 569 | policy := func(context.Context, string) PlannerDecision { |
| 570 | return PlannerDecision{Route: PlannerRoutePlanOnly, Depth: PlannerDepthFull, Reason: "user_plan_only"} |
| 571 | } |
| 572 | sink := &recordSink{} |
| 573 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, sink) |
| 574 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 575 | planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, |
| 576 | executor, 0, sink, policy, |
| 577 | ) |
| 578 | approval := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: true} |
| 579 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(approval) |
| 580 | |
| 581 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "只规划认证迁移,不要执行"); err != nil { |
| 582 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 583 | } |
| 584 | if approval.calls != 0 { |
| 585 | t.Fatalf("approval calls = %d, want 0 for an explicit no-execution request", approval.calls) |
| 586 | } |
| 587 | if len(exec.requests) != 0 { |
| 588 | t.Fatal("executor ran for an explicit plan-only request") |
| 589 | } |
| 590 | msgs := executor.Session().Messages |
| 591 | if len(msgs) < 2 || !strings.Contains(msgs[len(msgs)-1].Content, plannerPlanOnlyNote) { |
| 592 | t.Fatalf("plan-only turn was not persisted for a later user continuation: %+v", msgs) |
| 593 | } |
| 594 | } |
| 595 | |
| 596 | func TestCoordinatorPlanOnlyContinuesWithExecutorOnNextTurn(t *testing.T) { |
| 597 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 598 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. inspect auth\n2. migrate tokens"}, |
| 599 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 600 | }} |
| 601 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 602 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Migration complete."}, |
| 603 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 604 | }} |
| 605 | policy := func(_ context.Context, input string) PlannerDecision { |
| 606 | if strings.Contains(input, "只规划") { |
| 607 | return PlannerDecision{Route: PlannerRoutePlanOnly, Depth: PlannerDepthFull, Reason: "user_plan_only"} |
| 608 | } |
| 609 | return PlannerDecision{Route: PlannerRouteExecutorOnly, Depth: PlannerDepthNone, Reason: "short_reply"} |
| 610 | } |
| 611 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 612 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 613 | planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, |
| 614 | executor, 0, event.Discard, policy, |
| 615 | ) |
| 616 | |
| 617 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "只规划认证迁移,不要执行"); err != nil { |
| 618 | t.Fatalf("plan-only Run: %v", err) |
| 619 | } |
| 620 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 621 | t.Fatalf("executor requests after plan-only turn = %d, want none", got) |
| 622 | } |
| 623 | |
| 624 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "执行"); err != nil { |
| 625 | t.Fatalf("continuation Run: %v", err) |
| 626 | } |
| 627 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 1 { |
| 628 | t.Fatalf("executor requests after continuation = %d, want one", got) |
| 629 | } |
| 630 | req := exec.requests[0] |
| 631 | if got := lastUser(req); !strings.Contains(got, "执行") { |
| 632 | t.Fatalf("executor continuation input = %q, want the user's execution request", got) |
| 633 | } |
| 634 | foundSavedPlan := false |
| 635 | for _, msg := range req.Messages { |
| 636 | if msg.Role == provider.RoleAssistant && |
| 637 | strings.Contains(msg.Content, "migrate tokens") && |
| 638 | strings.Contains(msg.Content, plannerPlanOnlyNote) { |
| 639 | foundSavedPlan = true |
| 640 | break |
| 641 | } |
| 642 | } |
| 643 | if !foundSavedPlan { |
| 644 | t.Fatalf("executor continuation did not receive the saved plan-only turn: %+v", req.Messages) |
| 645 | } |
| 646 | if got := len(planner.requests); got != 1 { |
| 647 | t.Fatalf("planner requests = %d, want only the original plan-only turn", got) |
| 648 | } |
| 649 | } |
| 650 | |
| 651 | func TestCoordinatorPlannerFailurePreservesExecutionBoundary(t *testing.T) { |
| 652 | cases := []struct { |
| 653 | name string |
| 654 | route PlannerRoute |
| 655 | reason string |
| 656 | input string |
| 657 | }{ |
| 658 | { |
| 659 | name: "plan only", |
| 660 | route: PlannerRoutePlanOnly, |
| 661 | reason: "user_plan_only", |
| 662 | input: "只规划认证迁移,不要执行", |
| 663 | }, |
| 664 | { |
| 665 | name: "plan for approval", |
| 666 | route: PlannerRoutePlanForApproval, |
| 667 | reason: "user_plan_for_approval", |
| 668 | input: "先规划认证迁移,等我确认后再执行", |
| 669 | }, |
| 670 | } |
| 671 | for _, tc := range cases { |
| 672 | t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) { |
| 673 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 674 | {Type: provider.ChunkError, Err: fmt.Errorf("rate limited")}, |
| 675 | }} |
| 676 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 677 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "must not run"}, |
| 678 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 679 | }} |
| 680 | policy := func(context.Context, string) PlannerDecision { |
| 681 | return PlannerDecision{Route: tc.route, Depth: PlannerDepthFull, Reason: tc.reason} |
| 682 | } |
| 683 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 684 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 685 | planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, |
| 686 | executor, 0, event.Discard, policy, |
| 687 | ) |
| 688 | |
| 689 | err := coord.Run(context.Background(), tc.input) |
| 690 | if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "planner:") { |
| 691 | t.Fatalf("Run = %v, want planner failure", err) |
| 692 | } |
| 693 | if len(exec.requests) != 0 { |
| 694 | t.Fatal("executor fallback violated the requested execution boundary") |
| 695 | } |
| 696 | }) |
| 697 | } |
| 698 | } |
| 699 | |
| 700 | type coordinatorTestTool struct { |
| 701 | name string |
| 702 | readOnly bool |
| 703 | output string |
| 704 | } |
| 705 | |
| 706 | func (t coordinatorTestTool) Name() string { return t.name } |
| 707 | func (t coordinatorTestTool) Description() string { return t.name + " test tool" } |
| 708 | func (t coordinatorTestTool) Schema() json.RawMessage { |
| 709 | return json.RawMessage(`{"type":"object","properties":{"path":{"type":"string"}}}`) |
| 710 | } |
| 711 | func (t coordinatorTestTool) Execute(context.Context, json.RawMessage) (string, error) { |
| 712 | return t.output, nil |
| 713 | } |
| 714 | func (t coordinatorTestTool) ReadOnly() bool { return t.readOnly } |
| 715 | |
| 716 | func TestCoordinatorPlannerUsesReadOnlyResearchTools(t *testing.T) { |
| 717 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 718 | { |
| 719 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"REASONIX.md"}`}}, |
| 720 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 721 | }, |
| 722 | { |
| 723 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. follow the loaded rule\n2. edit the narrow file"}, |
| 724 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 725 | }, |
| 726 | }} |
| 727 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 728 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 729 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 730 | }} |
| 731 | |
| 732 | parentReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 733 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "Rule: keep changes narrow."}) |
| 734 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "write_file", readOnly: false}) |
| 735 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "todo_write", readOnly: true}) |
| 736 | |
| 737 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 738 | plannerSess := NewSession(PlannerPromptWithContext("Rule: keep changes narrow.")) |
| 739 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, plannerSess, nil, PlannerToolRegistry(parentReg), Options{MaxSteps: 4}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 740 | |
| 741 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 742 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 743 | } |
| 744 | |
| 745 | if len(planner.requests) < 2 { |
| 746 | t.Fatalf("planner made %d provider request(s), want a tool round and a final plan", len(planner.requests)) |
| 747 | } |
| 748 | tools := toolSchemaNames(planner.requests[0].Tools) |
| 749 | if !contains(tools, "read_file") { |
| 750 | t.Fatalf("planner tools = %v, want read_file", tools) |
| 751 | } |
| 752 | for _, forbidden := range []string{"write_file", "todo_write"} { |
| 753 | if contains(tools, forbidden) { |
| 754 | t.Fatalf("planner tools = %v, must not include %s", tools, forbidden) |
| 755 | } |
| 756 | } |
| 757 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "follow the loaded rule") || !strings.Contains(got, "fix the bug") { |
| 758 | t.Errorf("executor saw user %q, want task + planner plan", got) |
| 759 | } |
| 760 | if got := plannerSess.Messages[0].Content; !strings.Contains(got, "Rule: keep changes narrow.") { |
| 761 | t.Errorf("planner system prompt missing planning context: %q", got) |
| 762 | } |
| 763 | } |
| 764 | |
| 765 | func TestCoordinatorSetReasoningLanguageClearsPlannerAgent(t *testing.T) { |
| 766 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 767 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. inspect the narrow path"}, |
| 768 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 769 | }} |
| 770 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 771 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 772 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 773 | }} |
| 774 | |
| 775 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{ReasoningLanguage: "zh"}, event.Discard) |
| 776 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, tool.NewRegistry(), Options{ReasoningLanguage: "zh"}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 777 | coord.SetReasoningLanguage("auto") |
| 778 | |
| 779 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "plan a change"); err != nil { |
| 780 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 781 | } |
| 782 | |
| 783 | if got := lastUser(planner.requests[0]); strings.Contains(got, "<reasoning-language>") { |
| 784 | t.Fatalf("planner should clear stale reasoning language after live auto update, got %q", got) |
| 785 | } |
| 786 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); strings.Contains(got, "<reasoning-language>") { |
| 787 | t.Fatalf("executor should clear stale reasoning language after live auto update, got %q", got) |
| 788 | } |
| 789 | } |
| 790 | |
| 791 | func TestCoordinatorPlannerMaxStepsUsesExplicitRuntimeKey(t *testing.T) { |
| 792 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 793 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"REASONIX.md"}`}}, |
| 794 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 795 | }} |
| 796 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 797 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 798 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 799 | }} |
| 800 | |
| 801 | parentReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 802 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "keep reading"}) |
| 803 | sink := &recordSink{} |
| 804 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, sink) |
| 805 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 806 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, plannerSess, nil, PlannerToolRegistry(parentReg), Options{ |
| 807 | MaxSteps: 2, |
| 808 | MaxStepsKey: "planner max_steps", |
| 809 | }, executor, 0, sink, nil) |
| 810 | |
| 811 | err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "plan a change") |
| 812 | if err != nil { |
| 813 | t.Fatalf("Run should fall back to the executor when the planner cannot finalize: %v", err) |
| 814 | } |
| 815 | if got := len(planner.requests); got != 3 { |
| 816 | t.Fatalf("planner requests = %d, want 2 research rounds plus finalization", got) |
| 817 | } |
| 818 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 1 { |
| 819 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want one fallback run", got) |
| 820 | } |
| 821 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "plan a change") || strings.Contains(got, executorHandoffMarker) { |
| 822 | t.Fatalf("executor fallback input = %q, want the original task without a fabricated handoff", got) |
| 823 | } |
| 824 | if got := len(plannerSess.Messages); got != 1 { |
| 825 | t.Fatalf("planner session messages = %d, want the incomplete turn rolled back", got) |
| 826 | } |
| 827 | notices := sink.kinds(event.Notice) |
| 828 | if len(notices) == 0 || notices[len(notices)-1].Text != plannerResearchFallbackNotice { |
| 829 | t.Fatalf("notices = %+v, want planner research fallback notice", notices) |
| 830 | } |
| 831 | if detail := notices[len(notices)-1].Detail; !strings.Contains(detail, "planner max_steps") || |
| 832 | strings.Contains(detail, "set planner max_steps") { |
| 833 | t.Fatalf("fallback detail = %q, want the bounded diagnostic without configuration advice", detail) |
| 834 | } |
| 835 | } |
| 836 | |
| 837 | func TestCoordinatorPlannerMaxStepsZeroIsUnlimited(t *testing.T) { |
| 838 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 839 | { |
| 840 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"a"}`}}, |
| 841 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 842 | }, |
| 843 | { |
| 844 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-2", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"b"}`}}, |
| 845 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 846 | }, |
| 847 | { |
| 848 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. use both files"}, |
| 849 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 850 | }, |
| 851 | }} |
| 852 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 853 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 854 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 855 | }} |
| 856 | |
| 857 | parentReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 858 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "ok"}) |
| 859 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 860 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, PlannerToolRegistry(parentReg), Options{ |
| 861 | MaxSteps: 0, |
| 862 | MaxStepsKey: "planner max_steps", |
| 863 | }, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 864 | |
| 865 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "plan a change"); err != nil { |
| 866 | t.Fatalf("Run with planner max steps 0 should not pause: %v", err) |
| 867 | } |
| 868 | if got := len(planner.requests); got != 3 { |
| 869 | t.Fatalf("planner requests = %d, want all 3 scripted planner turns", got) |
| 870 | } |
| 871 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "use both files") { |
| 872 | t.Fatalf("executor did not receive planner output: %q", got) |
| 873 | } |
| 874 | } |
| 875 | |
| 876 | func TestCoordinatorPlannerDepthAppliesPerTurnResearchBudget(t *testing.T) { |
| 877 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 878 | {{Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"a"}`}}, {Type: provider.ChunkDone}}, |
| 879 | {{Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-2", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"b"}`}}, {Type: provider.ChunkDone}}, |
| 880 | {{Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "1. apply the narrow change\n2. run the focused test"}, {Type: provider.ChunkDone}}, |
| 881 | }} |
| 882 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 883 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 884 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 885 | }} |
| 886 | parentReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 887 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "ok"}) |
| 888 | policy := func(context.Context, string) PlannerDecision { |
| 889 | return PlannerDecision{ |
| 890 | Route: PlannerRoutePlanAndExecute, Depth: PlannerDepthLight, |
| 891 | Reason: "bounded_work", MaxResearchRounds: 2, |
| 892 | } |
| 893 | } |
| 894 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 895 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 896 | planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, PlannerToolRegistry(parentReg), Options{MaxSteps: 0}, |
| 897 | executor, 0, event.Discard, policy, |
| 898 | ) |
| 899 | |
| 900 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "make the bounded change"); err != nil { |
| 901 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 902 | } |
| 903 | if got := len(planner.requests); got != 3 { |
| 904 | t.Fatalf("planner requests = %d, want two research rounds plus one finalization round", got) |
| 905 | } |
| 906 | if got := lastUser(planner.requests[2]); !strings.Contains(got, "planner research rounds") || |
| 907 | !strings.Contains(got, "Do not call any more tools") || |
| 908 | !strings.Contains(got, "label remaining uncertainty") || |
| 909 | strings.Contains(got, "increase planner research rounds") { |
| 910 | t.Fatalf("planner did not receive the depth budget finalization nudge: %q", got) |
| 911 | } |
| 912 | var sawHandoff bool |
| 913 | for _, req := range exec.requests { |
| 914 | if strings.Contains(lastUser(req), executorHandoffMarker) { |
| 915 | sawHandoff = true |
| 916 | } |
| 917 | } |
| 918 | if !sawHandoff { |
| 919 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, none received the bounded plan handoff", len(exec.requests)) |
| 920 | } |
| 921 | } |
| 922 | |
| 923 | func TestCoordinatorNudgesExecutorThatAnswersWithoutActing(t *testing.T) { |
| 924 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 925 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Write the requested skill file."}, |
| 926 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 927 | }} |
| 928 | // The first turn is a plain final answer with no tool call and no |
| 929 | // planner-vocabulary — the nudge must fire on the missing action, not on words. |
| 930 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 931 | { |
| 932 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "这个计划看起来没问题,应该很好实现。"}, |
| 933 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 934 | }, |
| 935 | { |
| 936 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "write_file", Arguments: `{"path":"kan-tu.md"}`}}, |
| 937 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 938 | }, |
| 939 | { |
| 940 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 941 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 942 | }, |
| 943 | }} |
| 944 | |
| 945 | execReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 946 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "write_file", readOnly: false, output: "wrote file"}) |
| 947 | executor := New(exec, execReg, NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 948 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 949 | |
| 950 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "install the skill"); err != nil { |
| 951 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 952 | } |
| 953 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 3 { |
| 954 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want answer-without-acting, nudge tool call, final answer", got) |
| 955 | } |
| 956 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[1]); !strings.Contains(got, "Use your available tools now to carry out the task") { |
| 957 | t.Fatalf("second executor request missing handoff nudge message: %q", got) |
| 958 | } |
| 959 | } |
| 960 | |
| 961 | func TestExecutorHandoffRetryMessageKeepsUserChoicesInteractive(t *testing.T) { |
| 962 | msg := executorHandoffRetryMessage() |
| 963 | lower := strings.ToLower(msg) |
| 964 | for _, want := range []string{ |
| 965 | "ask tool", |
| 966 | "wait for its tool result", |
| 967 | "do not ask in prose", |
| 968 | "do not claim the user answered", |
| 969 | } { |
| 970 | if !strings.Contains(lower, want) { |
| 971 | t.Fatalf("executorHandoffRetryMessage() missing %q:\n%s", want, msg) |
| 972 | } |
| 973 | } |
| 974 | } |
| 975 | |
| 976 | func TestCoordinatorAllowsGuidanceOnlyExecutorHandoff(t *testing.T) { |
| 977 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 978 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Tell the user to open the audio app, enable the Peace checkbox, and play a song to compare the difference."}, |
| 979 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 980 | }} |
| 981 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 982 | { |
| 983 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Open the audio app, enable the Peace checkbox, then play a familiar song and compare the sound with the switch on and off."}, |
| 984 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 985 | }, |
| 986 | }} |
| 987 | |
| 988 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 989 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 990 | |
| 991 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "I just installed EqualizerAPO, now what?"); err != nil { |
| 992 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 993 | } |
| 994 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 1 { |
| 995 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want one guidance-only final answer with no handoff nudge", got) |
| 996 | } |
| 997 | } |
| 998 | |
| 999 | func TestCoordinatorAllowsGuidanceOnlyPlanWithExecutorToolContext(t *testing.T) { |
| 1000 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1001 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Tell the user to open the audio app, enable the checkbox, and listen to compare the difference."}, |
| 1002 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1003 | }} |
| 1004 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1005 | { |
| 1006 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Open the app, enable the checkbox, then listen and compare."}, |
| 1007 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1008 | }, |
| 1009 | }} |
| 1010 | |
| 1011 | execReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1012 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "file"}) |
| 1013 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "write_file", readOnly: false, output: "wrote file"}) |
| 1014 | executor := New(exec, execReg, NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1015 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1016 | |
| 1017 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "Please advise on the manual audio check."); err != nil { |
| 1018 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1019 | } |
| 1020 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 1 { |
| 1021 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want guidance final answer without nudge despite tool context", got) |
| 1022 | } |
| 1023 | } |
| 1024 | |
| 1025 | func TestCoordinatorNudgesWorkTaskEvenIfPlannerMentionsUserGuidance(t *testing.T) { |
| 1026 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1027 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Tell the user to edit main.go and add the missing branch."}, |
| 1028 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1029 | }} |
| 1030 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1031 | { |
| 1032 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Open main.go and add the missing branch in the handler."}, |
| 1033 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1034 | }, |
| 1035 | { |
| 1036 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "write_file", Arguments: `{"path":"main.go"}`}}, |
| 1037 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1038 | }, |
| 1039 | { |
| 1040 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1041 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1042 | }, |
| 1043 | }} |
| 1044 | |
| 1045 | execReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1046 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "write_file", readOnly: false, output: "wrote file"}) |
| 1047 | executor := New(exec, execReg, NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1048 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1049 | |
| 1050 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 1051 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1052 | } |
| 1053 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 3 { |
| 1054 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want text answer, nudge tool call, final answer", got) |
| 1055 | } |
| 1056 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[1]); !strings.Contains(got, "Use your available tools now to carry out the task") { |
| 1057 | t.Fatalf("second executor request missing handoff nudge message: %q", got) |
| 1058 | } |
| 1059 | } |
| 1060 | |
| 1061 | func TestCoordinatorNudgesMixedGuidanceAndWorkTask(t *testing.T) { |
| 1062 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1063 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Tell the user to summarize the behavior and update README."}, |
| 1064 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1065 | }} |
| 1066 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1067 | { |
| 1068 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Here is the current behavior summary."}, |
| 1069 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1070 | }, |
| 1071 | { |
| 1072 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "write_file", Arguments: `{"path":"README.md"}`}}, |
| 1073 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1074 | }, |
| 1075 | { |
| 1076 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1077 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1078 | }, |
| 1079 | }} |
| 1080 | |
| 1081 | execReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1082 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "write_file", readOnly: false, output: "wrote file"}) |
| 1083 | executor := New(exec, execReg, NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1084 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1085 | |
| 1086 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "summarize the current behavior and update the README"); err != nil { |
| 1087 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1088 | } |
| 1089 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 3 { |
| 1090 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want mixed guidance/work task to nudge before tool call", got) |
| 1091 | } |
| 1092 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[1]); !strings.Contains(got, "Use your available tools now to carry out the task") { |
| 1093 | t.Fatalf("second executor request missing handoff nudge message: %q", got) |
| 1094 | } |
| 1095 | } |
| 1096 | |
| 1097 | func TestCoordinatorSkipsExecutorWhenPlannerConcludesNoChanges(t *testing.T) { |
| 1098 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1099 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "No changes are needed; the current implementation already handles this.\n[no_changes]"}, |
| 1100 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1101 | }} |
| 1102 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1103 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Should not run."}, |
| 1104 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1105 | }} |
| 1106 | |
| 1107 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1108 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1109 | |
| 1110 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "check whether the fix is already present"); err != nil { |
| 1111 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1112 | } |
| 1113 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 1114 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want skip after no-op planner conclusion", got) |
| 1115 | } |
| 1116 | messages := executor.session.Messages |
| 1117 | if got := len(messages); got != 3 { |
| 1118 | t.Fatalf("executor session messages = %d, want system + user + no-op assistant", got) |
| 1119 | } |
| 1120 | if got := messages[1].Content; !strings.Contains(got, "check whether the fix is already present") { |
| 1121 | t.Fatalf("persisted executor user message = %q, want original task", got) |
| 1122 | } |
| 1123 | if got := messages[2].Content; !strings.Contains(got, "No changes are needed") { |
| 1124 | t.Fatalf("persisted executor assistant message = %q, want no-op planner conclusion", got) |
| 1125 | } |
| 1126 | } |
| 1127 | |
| 1128 | func TestCoordinatorDoesNotTreatGenericPositivePlanAsNoOp(t *testing.T) { |
| 1129 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1130 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Looks good. Edit main.go and add the missing guard."}, |
| 1131 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1132 | }} |
| 1133 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1134 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1135 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1136 | }} |
| 1137 | |
| 1138 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1139 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1140 | |
| 1141 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the missing guard"); err != nil { |
| 1142 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1143 | } |
| 1144 | if got := len(exec.requests); got == 0 { |
| 1145 | t.Fatal("executor should run for a plan that still contains work") |
| 1146 | } |
| 1147 | } |
| 1148 | |
| 1149 | func TestCoordinatorDoesNotSkipExecutorForPartialNoOpPlanWithActions(t *testing.T) { |
| 1150 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1151 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "No changes are needed in code, but run the test suite."}, |
| 1152 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1153 | }} |
| 1154 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1155 | { |
| 1156 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "bash", Arguments: `{"cmd":"go test ./..."}`}}, |
| 1157 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1158 | }, |
| 1159 | { |
| 1160 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Tests passed."}, |
| 1161 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1162 | }, |
| 1163 | }} |
| 1164 | |
| 1165 | execReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1166 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "bash", readOnly: false, output: "ok"}) |
| 1167 | executor := New(exec, execReg, NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1168 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1169 | |
| 1170 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "check the implementation and test it"); err != nil { |
| 1171 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1172 | } |
| 1173 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 2 { |
| 1174 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want tool execution and final answer", got) |
| 1175 | } |
| 1176 | } |
| 1177 | |
| 1178 | func TestCoordinatorHandoffAffirmsExecutorToolSchemasWhenPlannerClaimsNoMCP(t *testing.T) { |
| 1179 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1180 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "I only have read-only tools and cannot access GitHub MCP; use the executor to search GitHub."}, |
| 1181 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1182 | }} |
| 1183 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1184 | { |
| 1185 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "GitHub MCP is unavailable."}, |
| 1186 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1187 | }, |
| 1188 | { |
| 1189 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "mcp__github__search", Arguments: `{"query":"Reasonix discussions"}`}}, |
| 1190 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1191 | }, |
| 1192 | { |
| 1193 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1194 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1195 | }, |
| 1196 | }} |
| 1197 | |
| 1198 | execReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1199 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "mcp__github__search", readOnly: true, output: "discussion results"}) |
| 1200 | executor := New(exec, execReg, NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1201 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1202 | |
| 1203 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "search GitHub discussions"); err != nil { |
| 1204 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1205 | } |
| 1206 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 3 { |
| 1207 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want initial answer, corrective nudge, final answer", got) |
| 1208 | } |
| 1209 | if tools := toolSchemaNames(exec.requests[0].Tools); !contains(tools, "mcp__github__search") { |
| 1210 | t.Fatalf("executor request tools = %v, want MCP schema attached", tools) |
| 1211 | } |
| 1212 | first := lastUser(exec.requests[0]) |
| 1213 | for _, want := range []string{ |
| 1214 | "The executor request includes the full tool schema", |
| 1215 | "mcp__github__search", |
| 1216 | "Do not treat planner tool limitations or tool-unavailable claims as executor facts", |
| 1217 | } { |
| 1218 | if !strings.Contains(first, want) { |
| 1219 | t.Fatalf("initial executor handoff missing %q:\n%s", want, first) |
| 1220 | } |
| 1221 | } |
| 1222 | retry := lastUser(exec.requests[1]) |
| 1223 | for _, want := range []string{ |
| 1224 | "The tool schema is still attached to this executor request", |
| 1225 | "Do not invent that MCP servers or tools are unavailable", |
| 1226 | } { |
| 1227 | if !strings.Contains(retry, want) { |
| 1228 | t.Fatalf("executor retry nudge missing %q:\n%s", want, retry) |
| 1229 | } |
| 1230 | } |
| 1231 | } |
| 1232 | |
| 1233 | func TestCoordinatorDoesNotNudgeExecutorThatActs(t *testing.T) { |
| 1234 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1235 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Write the requested skill file."}, |
| 1236 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1237 | }} |
| 1238 | // Executor calls a tool on its first turn, then answers — no nudge expected. |
| 1239 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1240 | { |
| 1241 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "write_file", Arguments: `{"path":"kan-tu.md"}`}}, |
| 1242 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1243 | }, |
| 1244 | { |
| 1245 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1246 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1247 | }, |
| 1248 | }} |
| 1249 | |
| 1250 | execReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1251 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "write_file", readOnly: false, output: "wrote file"}) |
| 1252 | executor := New(exec, execReg, NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1253 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1254 | |
| 1255 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "install the skill"); err != nil { |
| 1256 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1257 | } |
| 1258 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 2 { |
| 1259 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want tool call + final answer with no nudge", got) |
| 1260 | } |
| 1261 | for i, req := range exec.requests { |
| 1262 | if strings.Contains(lastUser(req), "Use your available tools now to carry out the task") { |
| 1263 | t.Fatalf("request %d unexpectedly received a handoff nudge", i) |
| 1264 | } |
| 1265 | } |
| 1266 | } |
| 1267 | |
| 1268 | func toolSchemaNames(schemas []provider.ToolSchema) []string { |
| 1269 | out := make([]string, 0, len(schemas)) |
| 1270 | for _, s := range schemas { |
| 1271 | out = append(out, s.Name) |
| 1272 | } |
| 1273 | return out |
| 1274 | } |
| 1275 | |
| 1276 | func contains(items []string, want string) bool { |
| 1277 | for _, item := range items { |
| 1278 | if item == want { |
| 1279 | return true |
| 1280 | } |
| 1281 | } |
| 1282 | return false |
| 1283 | } |
| 1284 | |
| 1285 | func BenchmarkPlannerToolRegistry(b *testing.B) { |
| 1286 | parentReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1287 | for i := 0; i < 200; i++ { |
| 1288 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{ |
| 1289 | name: fmt.Sprintf("tool_%03d", i), |
| 1290 | readOnly: i%3 != 0, |
| 1291 | }) |
| 1292 | } |
| 1293 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "todo_write", readOnly: true}) |
| 1294 | parentReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "write_file", readOnly: false}) |
| 1295 | |
| 1296 | b.ReportAllocs() |
| 1297 | for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ { |
| 1298 | reg := PlannerToolRegistry(parentReg) |
| 1299 | if reg.Len() == 0 { |
| 1300 | b.Fatal("planner registry should retain read-only research tools") |
| 1301 | } |
| 1302 | } |
| 1303 | } |
| 1304 | |
| 1305 | func TestCoordinatorSetPlanModePropagates(t *testing.T) { |
| 1306 | prov := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1307 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "plan"}, |
| 1308 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1309 | }} |
| 1310 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 1311 | plannerReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1312 | plannerReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true}) |
| 1313 | plannerTools := PlannerToolRegistry(plannerReg) |
| 1314 | |
| 1315 | exec := New(nil, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1316 | |
| 1317 | coord := NewCoordinator(prov, plannerSess, nil, plannerTools, Options{MaxSteps: 2}, exec, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1318 | |
| 1319 | // Both should start with planMode=false |
| 1320 | if coord.plannerAgent.planMode.Load() { |
| 1321 | t.Error("planner should start with planMode=false") |
| 1322 | } |
| 1323 | if coord.executor.planMode.Load() { |
| 1324 | t.Error("executor should start with planMode=false") |
| 1325 | } |
| 1326 | |
| 1327 | // SetPlanMode(true) should propagate to both |
| 1328 | coord.SetPlanMode(true) |
| 1329 | if !coord.plannerAgent.planMode.Load() { |
| 1330 | t.Error("planner should have planMode=true after SetPlanMode(true)") |
| 1331 | } |
| 1332 | if !coord.executor.planMode.Load() { |
| 1333 | t.Error("executor should have planMode=true after SetPlanMode(true)") |
| 1334 | } |
| 1335 | |
| 1336 | // SetPlanMode(false) should propagate to both |
| 1337 | coord.SetPlanMode(false) |
| 1338 | if coord.plannerAgent.planMode.Load() { |
| 1339 | t.Error("planner should have planMode=false after SetPlanMode(false)") |
| 1340 | } |
| 1341 | if coord.executor.planMode.Load() { |
| 1342 | t.Error("executor should have planMode=false after SetPlanMode(false)") |
| 1343 | } |
| 1344 | } |
| 1345 | |
| 1346 | func TestCoordinatorSetPlanModeNilSafety(t *testing.T) { |
| 1347 | var c *Coordinator |
| 1348 | c.SetPlanMode(true) // should not panic |
| 1349 | c.SetPlanMode(false) // should not panic |
| 1350 | } |
| 1351 | |
| 1352 | // errorProvider fails every Stream call, standing in for a down/misconfigured |
| 1353 | // planner provider. |
| 1354 | type errorProvider struct{ name string } |
| 1355 | |
| 1356 | func (e *errorProvider) Name() string { return e.name } |
| 1357 | |
| 1358 | func (e *errorProvider) Stream(context.Context, provider.Request) (<-chan provider.Chunk, error) { |
| 1359 | return nil, fmt.Errorf("provider unavailable") |
| 1360 | } |
| 1361 | |
| 1362 | // TestIsNoOpPlan pins the no-op conclusion contract: only a final non-empty |
| 1363 | // line that is exactly the [no_changes] marker skips the executor. Phrase |
| 1364 | // conclusions without the marker deliberately do not — a wrong skip silently |
| 1365 | // drops the task, a missed one costs a single executor round. |
| 1366 | func TestIsNoOpPlan(t *testing.T) { |
| 1367 | cases := []struct { |
| 1368 | name string |
| 1369 | plan string |
| 1370 | want bool |
| 1371 | }{ |
| 1372 | {"empty", "", false}, |
| 1373 | {"conclusion phrase without marker", "No changes are needed; the current implementation already handles this.", false}, |
| 1374 | {"already implemented with follow-up work", "The auth flow is already implemented; extend it to cover refresh tokens.", false}, |
| 1375 | {"mid-plan aside is not a conclusion", "Findings:\nThis part is already handled by the retry helper.\nConfirm the desired direction with the user.", false}, |
| 1376 | {"explicit marker on final line", "The retry logic exists in client.go and the tests already run this path.\n[no_changes]", true}, |
| 1377 | {"marker with surrounding whitespace", "Notes on the guard.\n [no_changes] ", true}, |
| 1378 | {"marker mentioned before remaining work", "[no_changes] does not apply here.\nEdit main.go to add the missing guard.", false}, |
| 1379 | {"final line mentions marker in prose", "The guard exists but the tests are missing.\nDo not emit [no_changes] because work remains.", false}, |
| 1380 | {"marker with trailing prose on final line", "[no_changes] — but confirm the flag default first.", false}, |
| 1381 | {"negated conclusion", "It is not already implemented.", false}, |
| 1382 | {"no-op phrase with action verb", "No changes are needed in code, but run the test suite.", false}, |
| 1383 | {"chinese conclusion without marker", "无需改动,当前逻辑已经覆盖该场景。", false}, |
| 1384 | {"chinese follow-up work", "重试逻辑已经实现,但需要扩展覆盖刷新令牌。", false}, |
| 1385 | } |
| 1386 | for _, tc := range cases { |
| 1387 | t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) { |
| 1388 | if got := isNoOpPlan(tc.plan); got != tc.want { |
| 1389 | t.Errorf("isNoOpPlan(%q) = %v, want %v", tc.plan, got, tc.want) |
| 1390 | } |
| 1391 | }) |
| 1392 | } |
| 1393 | } |
| 1394 | |
| 1395 | // TestDefaultPlannerPromptRequestsNoChangesMarker keeps the producer and parser |
| 1396 | // of the no-op contract in sync: isNoOpPlan trusts the marker because the |
| 1397 | // planner prompt asks for it. |
| 1398 | func TestDefaultPlannerPromptRequestsNoChangesMarker(t *testing.T) { |
| 1399 | if !strings.Contains(DefaultPlannerPrompt, noChangesMarker) { |
| 1400 | t.Fatalf("DefaultPlannerPrompt does not request the %s marker isNoOpPlan parses", noChangesMarker) |
| 1401 | } |
| 1402 | } |
| 1403 | |
| 1404 | func TestDefaultPlannerPromptDefinesLightAndFullEvidenceContracts(t *testing.T) { |
| 1405 | for _, want := range []string{ |
| 1406 | "depth=light", |
| 1407 | "depth=full", |
| 1408 | "verified touchpoints", |
| 1409 | "candidate touchpoints", |
| 1410 | "command-level verification", |
| 1411 | "Label assumptions", |
| 1412 | } { |
| 1413 | if !strings.Contains(DefaultPlannerPrompt, want) { |
| 1414 | t.Fatalf("DefaultPlannerPrompt missing %q planning contract", want) |
| 1415 | } |
| 1416 | } |
| 1417 | } |
| 1418 | |
| 1419 | // TestCoordinatorDoesNotSkipExecutorForAlreadyImplementedPlanWithFollowUp is |
| 1420 | // the motivating regression: a plan acknowledging existing code while asking |
| 1421 | // for follow-up work must not be treated as a no-op conclusion. |
| 1422 | func TestCoordinatorDoesNotSkipExecutorForAlreadyImplementedPlanWithFollowUp(t *testing.T) { |
| 1423 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1424 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "The auth flow is already implemented; extend it to cover refresh tokens."}, |
| 1425 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1426 | }} |
| 1427 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1428 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1429 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1430 | }} |
| 1431 | |
| 1432 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1433 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1434 | |
| 1435 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "add refresh token support"); err != nil { |
| 1436 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1437 | } |
| 1438 | if got := len(exec.requests); got == 0 { |
| 1439 | t.Fatal("executor skipped: an already-implemented plan with follow-up work was treated as no-op") |
| 1440 | } |
| 1441 | if got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]); !strings.Contains(got, "extend it to cover refresh tokens") { |
| 1442 | t.Fatalf("executor handoff missing the plan: %q", got) |
| 1443 | } |
| 1444 | } |
| 1445 | |
| 1446 | // TestCoordinatorSkipsExecutorOnExplicitNoChangesMarker checks the marker |
| 1447 | // contract end to end: research prose above the marker may mention runs/tests |
| 1448 | // of existing code without vetoing the explicit conclusion. |
| 1449 | func TestCoordinatorSkipsExecutorOnExplicitNoChangesMarker(t *testing.T) { |
| 1450 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1451 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "The retry logic exists in client.go and the tests already run this path.\n[no_changes]"}, |
| 1452 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1453 | }} |
| 1454 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1455 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Should not run."}, |
| 1456 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1457 | }} |
| 1458 | |
| 1459 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1460 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1461 | |
| 1462 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "check whether retries are covered"); err != nil { |
| 1463 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1464 | } |
| 1465 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 1466 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want skip on explicit [no_changes] marker", got) |
| 1467 | } |
| 1468 | messages := executor.session.Messages |
| 1469 | if got := len(messages); got != 3 { |
| 1470 | t.Fatalf("executor session messages = %d, want system + user + no-op assistant", got) |
| 1471 | } |
| 1472 | if got := messages[2].Content; !strings.Contains(got, "[no_changes]") { |
| 1473 | t.Fatalf("persisted executor assistant message = %q, want the planner conclusion", got) |
| 1474 | } |
| 1475 | } |
| 1476 | |
| 1477 | // TestCoordinatorFallsBackToExecutorWhenPlannerFails checks that a planner |
| 1478 | // failure degrades the turn to executor-only instead of failing it: the |
| 1479 | // executor gets the raw input (no handoff boilerplate), a warning notice is |
| 1480 | // emitted, and the planner session is rolled back so the next plan does not |
| 1481 | // start with consecutive user messages. |
| 1482 | func TestCoordinatorFallsBackToExecutorWhenPlannerFails(t *testing.T) { |
| 1483 | cases := []struct { |
| 1484 | name string |
| 1485 | planner provider.Provider |
| 1486 | }{ |
| 1487 | {"stream call fails", &errorProvider{name: "planner"}}, |
| 1488 | {"stream emits error chunk", &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1489 | {Type: provider.ChunkError, Err: fmt.Errorf("rate limited")}, |
| 1490 | }}}, |
| 1491 | } |
| 1492 | for _, tc := range cases { |
| 1493 | t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) { |
| 1494 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1495 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1496 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1497 | }} |
| 1498 | var events []event.Event |
| 1499 | sink := event.FuncSink(func(e event.Event) { events = append(events, e) }) |
| 1500 | |
| 1501 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1502 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 1503 | coord := NewCoordinator(tc.planner, plannerSess, nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, sink, nil) |
| 1504 | |
| 1505 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 1506 | t.Fatalf("Run should fall back to the executor, got: %v", err) |
| 1507 | } |
| 1508 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 1 { |
| 1509 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want 1 fallback run", got) |
| 1510 | } |
| 1511 | got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]) |
| 1512 | if got != "fix the bug" || strings.Contains(got, "You are the executor now") { |
| 1513 | t.Fatalf("fallback executor input = %q, want the raw task without handoff boilerplate", got) |
| 1514 | } |
| 1515 | if n := len(plannerSess.Messages); n != 1 { |
| 1516 | t.Fatalf("planner session messages = %d, want rollback to system only", n) |
| 1517 | } |
| 1518 | var warned bool |
| 1519 | for _, e := range events { |
| 1520 | if e.Kind == event.Notice && e.Level == event.LevelWarn && strings.Contains(e.Text, "Planner failed") { |
| 1521 | warned = true |
| 1522 | } |
| 1523 | } |
| 1524 | if !warned { |
| 1525 | t.Fatal("missing warn notice about the planner fallback") |
| 1526 | } |
| 1527 | }) |
| 1528 | } |
| 1529 | } |
| 1530 | |
| 1531 | // TestCoordinatorPropagatesPlannerErrorWhenTurnCancelled keeps cancellation |
| 1532 | // semantics: a turn the user aborted must not silently restart on the executor. |
| 1533 | func TestCoordinatorPropagatesPlannerErrorWhenTurnCancelled(t *testing.T) { |
| 1534 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1535 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Should not run."}, |
| 1536 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1537 | }} |
| 1538 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1539 | coord := NewCoordinator(&errorProvider{name: "planner"}, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1540 | |
| 1541 | ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background()) |
| 1542 | cancel() |
| 1543 | err := coord.Run(ctx, "fix the bug") |
| 1544 | if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "planner:") { |
| 1545 | t.Fatalf("Run = %v, want propagated planner error on cancelled turn", err) |
| 1546 | } |
| 1547 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 1548 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want none after user cancellation", got) |
| 1549 | } |
| 1550 | } |
| 1551 | |
| 1552 | // TestCoordinatorRollsBackPlannerSessionOnToolPlannerFailure covers the |
| 1553 | // production two-model wiring (boot passes PlannerToolRegistry, so planning |
| 1554 | // runs through planWithTools): when the tool-enabled planner fails, the |
| 1555 | // executor fallback must not leave the planner session with a dangling user |
| 1556 | // message or partial tool rounds — the next plan would otherwise start with |
| 1557 | // consecutive user roles, which some providers reject. |
| 1558 | func TestCoordinatorRollsBackPlannerSessionOnToolPlannerFailure(t *testing.T) { |
| 1559 | cases := []struct { |
| 1560 | name string |
| 1561 | planner provider.Provider |
| 1562 | }{ |
| 1563 | {"stream call fails", &errorProvider{name: "planner"}}, |
| 1564 | {"fails after a tool round", &mockProvider{name: "planner", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1565 | { |
| 1566 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"main.go"}`}}, |
| 1567 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1568 | }, |
| 1569 | { |
| 1570 | {Type: provider.ChunkError, Err: fmt.Errorf("rate limited")}, |
| 1571 | }, |
| 1572 | }}}, |
| 1573 | } |
| 1574 | for _, tc := range cases { |
| 1575 | t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) { |
| 1576 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1577 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1578 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1579 | }} |
| 1580 | plannerReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1581 | plannerReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "package main"}) |
| 1582 | |
| 1583 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1584 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 1585 | coord := NewCoordinator(tc.planner, plannerSess, nil, plannerReg, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1586 | |
| 1587 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 1588 | t.Fatalf("Run should fall back to the executor, got: %v", err) |
| 1589 | } |
| 1590 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 1 { |
| 1591 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want 1 fallback run", got) |
| 1592 | } |
| 1593 | if n := len(plannerSess.Messages); n != 1 { |
| 1594 | t.Fatalf("planner session messages = %d, want rollback to system only", n) |
| 1595 | } |
| 1596 | }) |
| 1597 | } |
| 1598 | } |
| 1599 | |
| 1600 | func TestCoordinatorPlannerResearchPausePreservesExecutionBoundaries(t *testing.T) { |
| 1601 | for _, route := range []PlannerRoute{PlannerRoutePlanOnly, PlannerRoutePlanForApproval} { |
| 1602 | t.Run(string(route), func(t *testing.T) { |
| 1603 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1604 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"main.go"}`}}, |
| 1605 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1606 | }} |
| 1607 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor"} |
| 1608 | plannerReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1609 | plannerReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "package main"}) |
| 1610 | policy := func(context.Context, string) PlannerDecision { |
| 1611 | return PlannerDecision{Route: route, Depth: PlannerDepthFull, Reason: "explicit_boundary", MaxResearchRounds: 1} |
| 1612 | } |
| 1613 | |
| 1614 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1615 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 1616 | coord := NewCoordinatorWithPlannerPolicy( |
| 1617 | planner, plannerSess, nil, plannerReg, Options{MaxSteps: 0}, |
| 1618 | executor, 0, event.Discard, policy, |
| 1619 | ) |
| 1620 | |
| 1621 | err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "plan the migration") |
| 1622 | if err == nil || err.Error() != plannerResearchBoundaryError { |
| 1623 | t.Fatalf("Run = %v, want the safe planner boundary error", err) |
| 1624 | } |
| 1625 | if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "set planner research rounds") { |
| 1626 | t.Fatalf("pause exposed a non-configurable setting: %q", err) |
| 1627 | } |
| 1628 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 0 { |
| 1629 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want none across %s", got, route) |
| 1630 | } |
| 1631 | if got := len(plannerSess.Messages); got != 1 { |
| 1632 | t.Fatalf("planner session messages = %d, want the incomplete turn rolled back", got) |
| 1633 | } |
| 1634 | }) |
| 1635 | } |
| 1636 | } |
| 1637 | |
| 1638 | func TestCoordinatorRollbackAfterRewriteDropsPausedPlannerToolCall(t *testing.T) { |
| 1639 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 1640 | before := plannerSess.Snapshot() |
| 1641 | rewriteBefore := plannerSess.RewriteVersion() |
| 1642 | |
| 1643 | plannerSess.Replace([]provider.Message{ |
| 1644 | {Role: provider.RoleSystem, Content: "planner-sys"}, |
| 1645 | {Role: provider.RoleUser, Content: summaryTagOpen + "\ncompacted research\n</summary>"}, |
| 1646 | {Role: provider.RoleAssistant, Content: "Completed evidence from the bounded research rounds."}, |
| 1647 | }) |
| 1648 | plannerSess.IncrementRewrite() |
| 1649 | plannerSess.Add(provider.Message{Role: provider.RoleUser, Content: "Do not call any more tools; finalize."}) |
| 1650 | plannerSess.Add(provider.Message{ |
| 1651 | Role: provider.RoleAssistant, |
| 1652 | ToolCalls: []provider.ToolCall{{ |
| 1653 | ID: "ignored-finalization-call", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"more.go"}`, |
| 1654 | }}, |
| 1655 | }) |
| 1656 | |
| 1657 | coord := &Coordinator{plannerSess: plannerSess} |
| 1658 | coord.rollbackPlannerTurn(before, rewriteBefore) |
| 1659 | |
| 1660 | msgs := plannerSess.Snapshot() |
| 1661 | if len(msgs) != 3 { |
| 1662 | t.Fatalf("planner session messages = %d, want compacted prefix plus completed evidence", len(msgs)) |
| 1663 | } |
| 1664 | if last := msgs[len(msgs)-1]; last.Role != provider.RoleAssistant || |
| 1665 | len(last.ToolCalls) != 0 || last.Content == "" { |
| 1666 | t.Fatalf("planner session has an unusable pause tail: %+v", last) |
| 1667 | } |
| 1668 | if normalized := provider.NormalizeMessages(msgs); len(normalized) != len(msgs) { |
| 1669 | t.Fatalf("planner session still needs tool-pair repair after rollback: %+v", normalized) |
| 1670 | } |
| 1671 | } |
| 1672 | |
| 1673 | // TestCoordinatorRunsExecutorWhenMarkerNotAlone is the F2 regression: a final |
| 1674 | // line that mentions [no_changes] in prose is not the no-op conclusion, so the |
| 1675 | // executor must still run. |
| 1676 | func TestCoordinatorRunsExecutorWhenMarkerNotAlone(t *testing.T) { |
| 1677 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1678 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "The guard exists but the tests are missing.\nDo not emit [no_changes] because work remains."}, |
| 1679 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1680 | }} |
| 1681 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1682 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1683 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1684 | }} |
| 1685 | |
| 1686 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1687 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1688 | |
| 1689 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "add the missing tests"); err != nil { |
| 1690 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1691 | } |
| 1692 | if got := len(exec.requests); got == 0 { |
| 1693 | t.Fatal("executor skipped: a final line mentioning the marker in prose was treated as a no-op conclusion") |
| 1694 | } |
| 1695 | } |
| 1696 | |
| 1697 | // TestCoordinatorHandoffSurvivesPlannerCompaction pins the plan-scan boundary |
| 1698 | // against session rewrites: when the tool-enabled planner's final answer pushes |
| 1699 | // usage past the compaction trigger, Agent.Run rewrites and shortens the |
| 1700 | // planner session right after producing the plan. The pre-turn message count |
| 1701 | // then no longer bounds "this turn's messages" — scanning from it must not |
| 1702 | // hide the plan, or Coordinator.Run degrades to a raw executor turn despite a |
| 1703 | // successful plan. |
| 1704 | func TestCoordinatorHandoffSurvivesPlannerCompaction(t *testing.T) { |
| 1705 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1706 | { // the plan, with usage past the force-compaction watermark |
| 1707 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Edit main.go and add the missing guard."}, |
| 1708 | {Type: provider.ChunkUsage, Usage: &provider.Usage{PromptTokens: 1900, TotalTokens: 1950}}, |
| 1709 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1710 | }, |
| 1711 | { // the compaction summarizer call |
| 1712 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "- goal: guard work\n- pending: none"}, |
| 1713 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1714 | }, |
| 1715 | }} |
| 1716 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1717 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1718 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1719 | }} |
| 1720 | |
| 1721 | plannerReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1722 | plannerReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "ok"}) |
| 1723 | |
| 1724 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1725 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 1726 | // Preset enough planner history that the fold shrinks the session to (or |
| 1727 | // below) its pre-turn length, which is what strands a boundary based on |
| 1728 | // the pre-turn message count. |
| 1729 | filler := strings.Repeat("planner history filler. ", 150) |
| 1730 | for i := 0; i < 3; i++ { |
| 1731 | plannerSess.Add(provider.Message{Role: provider.RoleUser, Content: filler}) |
| 1732 | plannerSess.Add(provider.Message{Role: provider.RoleAssistant, Content: filler}) |
| 1733 | } |
| 1734 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, plannerSess, nil, plannerReg, Options{ContextWindow: 2000}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1735 | |
| 1736 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 1737 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1738 | } |
| 1739 | if plannerSess.RewriteVersion() == 0 { |
| 1740 | t.Fatal("test setup: planner compaction did not fire, the rewrite boundary is not exercised") |
| 1741 | } |
| 1742 | if got := len(exec.requests); got == 0 { |
| 1743 | t.Fatal("executor never ran") |
| 1744 | } |
| 1745 | got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]) |
| 1746 | if !strings.Contains(got, "Edit main.go and add the missing guard.") || !strings.Contains(got, executorHandoffMarker) { |
| 1747 | t.Fatalf("executor input lost the plan handoff after planner compaction:\n%s", got) |
| 1748 | } |
| 1749 | } |
| 1750 | |
| 1751 | // TestCoordinatorNoOpConclusionAttributedToPlanner pins the event source on the |
| 1752 | // relayed no-op conclusion: it is planner text and must not be attributed to |
| 1753 | // the executor by sinks that key styling/usage off Source. |
| 1754 | func TestCoordinatorNoOpConclusionAttributedToPlanner(t *testing.T) { |
| 1755 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1756 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "The guard already exists in parser.go.\n[no_changes]"}, |
| 1757 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1758 | }} |
| 1759 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor"} |
| 1760 | var events []event.Event |
| 1761 | sink := event.FuncSink(func(e event.Event) { events = append(events, e) }) |
| 1762 | |
| 1763 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1764 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, sink, nil) |
| 1765 | |
| 1766 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "check the parser guard"); err != nil { |
| 1767 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1768 | } |
| 1769 | var conclusion *event.Event |
| 1770 | for i := range events { |
| 1771 | if events[i].Kind == event.Text && strings.Contains(events[i].Text, "[no_changes]") { |
| 1772 | conclusion = &events[i] |
| 1773 | } |
| 1774 | } |
| 1775 | if conclusion == nil { |
| 1776 | t.Fatal("no-op conclusion text event not emitted") |
| 1777 | } |
| 1778 | if conclusion.Source != event.UsageSourcePlanner { |
| 1779 | t.Fatalf("no-op conclusion Source = %q, want planner attribution", conclusion.Source) |
| 1780 | } |
| 1781 | } |
| 1782 | |
| 1783 | // TestCoordinatorHandoffOmitsToolContextWithoutMCPTools checks that the handoff |
| 1784 | // does not restate the built-in tool schema: the tool-context block exists to |
| 1785 | // counter planner claims about MCP availability and is dropped entirely when |
| 1786 | // the executor carries no MCP tools. |
| 1787 | func TestCoordinatorHandoffOmitsToolContextWithoutMCPTools(t *testing.T) { |
| 1788 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1789 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Edit main.go and add the missing guard."}, |
| 1790 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1791 | }} |
| 1792 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1793 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1794 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1795 | }} |
| 1796 | |
| 1797 | execReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1798 | execReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "write_file", readOnly: false, output: "ok"}) |
| 1799 | executor := New(exec, execReg, NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1800 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1801 | |
| 1802 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the missing guard"); err != nil { |
| 1803 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1804 | } |
| 1805 | got := lastUser(exec.requests[0]) |
| 1806 | for _, unwanted := range []string{"Executor tool context", "Tool names include"} { |
| 1807 | if strings.Contains(got, unwanted) { |
| 1808 | t.Fatalf("handoff restates built-in tool schema (%q):\n%s", unwanted, got) |
| 1809 | } |
| 1810 | } |
| 1811 | if !strings.Contains(got, "Edit main.go") { |
| 1812 | t.Fatalf("handoff missing the plan: %q", got) |
| 1813 | } |
| 1814 | } |
| 1815 | |
| 1816 | // TestCoordinatorPassesTurnContextToPlannerGate pins the C2 contract: the gate |
| 1817 | // receives the live turn context, so a classifier-backed gate is cancelled |
| 1818 | // with the turn instead of running out its own timeout. |
| 1819 | func TestCoordinatorPassesTurnContextToPlannerGate(t *testing.T) { |
| 1820 | type gateCtxKey struct{} |
| 1821 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1822 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "It does X."}, |
| 1823 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1824 | }} |
| 1825 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1826 | |
| 1827 | var sawTurnValue bool |
| 1828 | gate := func(ctx context.Context, _ string) bool { |
| 1829 | sawTurnValue = ctx.Value(gateCtxKey{}) != nil |
| 1830 | return false |
| 1831 | } |
| 1832 | coord := NewCoordinator(&mockProvider{name: "planner"}, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, gate) |
| 1833 | |
| 1834 | ctx := context.WithValue(context.Background(), gateCtxKey{}, "turn") |
| 1835 | if err := coord.Run(ctx, "what does this do?"); err != nil { |
| 1836 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1837 | } |
| 1838 | if !sawTurnValue { |
| 1839 | t.Fatal("planner gate did not receive the turn context") |
| 1840 | } |
| 1841 | } |
| 1842 | |
| 1843 | // TestCoordinatorFailedTurnRollbackKeepsCompaction pins the rewrite-aware |
| 1844 | // rollback economics: when auto-compaction fires mid-turn (after a tool round) |
| 1845 | // and the planner THEN fails, restoring the pre-turn snapshot would revert the |
| 1846 | // compaction — wasting its summarizer call and re-growing the prompt. The |
| 1847 | // rollback must instead keep the compacted log and only drop trailing plain |
| 1848 | // user messages, so the next plan still starts from the folded history without |
| 1849 | // consecutive user roles. |
| 1850 | func TestCoordinatorFailedTurnRollbackKeepsCompaction(t *testing.T) { |
| 1851 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", streams: [][]provider.Chunk{ |
| 1852 | { // tool round whose usage crosses the force-compaction watermark |
| 1853 | {Type: provider.ChunkToolCall, ToolCall: &provider.ToolCall{ID: "call-1", Name: "read_file", Arguments: `{"path":"main.go"}`}}, |
| 1854 | {Type: provider.ChunkUsage, Usage: &provider.Usage{PromptTokens: 1900, TotalTokens: 1950}}, |
| 1855 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1856 | }, |
| 1857 | { // the compaction summarizer call |
| 1858 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "- goal: guard work\n- pending: continue"}, |
| 1859 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1860 | }, |
| 1861 | { // the next planner round fails |
| 1862 | {Type: provider.ChunkError, Err: fmt.Errorf("rate limited")}, |
| 1863 | }, |
| 1864 | }} |
| 1865 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1866 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 1867 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1868 | }} |
| 1869 | |
| 1870 | plannerReg := tool.NewRegistry() |
| 1871 | plannerReg.Add(coordinatorTestTool{name: "read_file", readOnly: true, output: "package main"}) |
| 1872 | |
| 1873 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 1874 | plannerSess := NewSession("planner-sys") |
| 1875 | filler := strings.Repeat("planner history filler. ", 150) |
| 1876 | for i := 0; i < 3; i++ { |
| 1877 | plannerSess.Add(provider.Message{Role: provider.RoleUser, Content: filler}) |
| 1878 | plannerSess.Add(provider.Message{Role: provider.RoleAssistant, Content: filler}) |
| 1879 | } |
| 1880 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, plannerSess, nil, plannerReg, Options{ContextWindow: 2000}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 1881 | |
| 1882 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "fix the bug"); err != nil { |
| 1883 | t.Fatalf("Run should fall back to the executor, got: %v", err) |
| 1884 | } |
| 1885 | if got := len(exec.requests); got != 1 { |
| 1886 | t.Fatalf("executor requests = %d, want 1 fallback run", got) |
| 1887 | } |
| 1888 | if plannerSess.RewriteVersion() == 0 { |
| 1889 | t.Fatal("test setup: planner compaction did not fire, the rewrite-aware rollback is not exercised") |
| 1890 | } |
| 1891 | msgs := plannerSess.Snapshot() |
| 1892 | var hasSummary bool |
| 1893 | for _, m := range msgs { |
| 1894 | if isCompactionSummary(m) { |
| 1895 | hasSummary = true |
| 1896 | } |
| 1897 | } |
| 1898 | if !hasSummary { |
| 1899 | t.Fatal("rollback reverted the compaction: no compaction summary left in the planner session") |
| 1900 | } |
| 1901 | if last := msgs[len(msgs)-1]; last.Role == provider.RoleUser && !isCompactionSummary(last) { |
| 1902 | t.Fatalf("planner session ends in a plain user message after rollback: %q", last.Content) |
| 1903 | } |
| 1904 | } |
| 1905 | |
| 1906 | // TestCoordinatorPersistsDeniedPlanTurnToExecutorSession pins the denial |
| 1907 | // bookkeeping: a plan the user declines must still land in the executor |
| 1908 | // session (like the no-op path) so the turn survives save/reload, with a note |
| 1909 | // telling the next executor turn that nothing ran, plus a user-facing notice. |
| 1910 | func TestCoordinatorPersistsDeniedPlanTurnToExecutorSession(t *testing.T) { |
| 1911 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1912 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Plan: rewrite auth.\n[planner_requires_approval]"}, |
| 1913 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1914 | }} |
| 1915 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1916 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "should not run"}, |
| 1917 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1918 | }} |
| 1919 | sink := &recordSink{} |
| 1920 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, sink) |
| 1921 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, sink, nil) |
| 1922 | gate := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: false} |
| 1923 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(gate) |
| 1924 | |
| 1925 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "rewrite auth"); err != nil { |
| 1926 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1927 | } |
| 1928 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 1929 | t.Fatalf("approval gate calls = %d, want 1", gate.calls) |
| 1930 | } |
| 1931 | if len(exec.requests) != 0 { |
| 1932 | t.Fatal("executor must not run when the plan is denied") |
| 1933 | } |
| 1934 | msgs := executor.session.Messages |
| 1935 | if len(msgs) < 2 { |
| 1936 | t.Fatalf("executor session messages = %d, want the denied turn persisted", len(msgs)) |
| 1937 | } |
| 1938 | last := msgs[len(msgs)-1] |
| 1939 | if last.Role != provider.RoleAssistant || !strings.Contains(last.Content, plannerPlanNotApprovedNote) { |
| 1940 | t.Fatalf("last executor message = %q (%s), want plan with not-approved note", last.Content, last.Role) |
| 1941 | } |
| 1942 | prev := msgs[len(msgs)-2] |
| 1943 | if prev.Role != provider.RoleUser || !strings.Contains(prev.Content, "rewrite auth") { |
| 1944 | t.Fatalf("persisted user turn = %q (%s), want original input", prev.Content, prev.Role) |
| 1945 | } |
| 1946 | foundNotice := false |
| 1947 | for _, e := range sink.kinds(event.Notice) { |
| 1948 | if strings.Contains(e.Text, "not approved") { |
| 1949 | foundNotice = true |
| 1950 | } |
| 1951 | } |
| 1952 | if !foundNotice { |
| 1953 | t.Fatal("denied plan should emit a user-facing notice") |
| 1954 | } |
| 1955 | } |
| 1956 | |
| 1957 | // TestCoordinatorPersistsUnansweredDecisionTurnToExecutorSession is the same |
| 1958 | // contract for the ask path: a cancelled/unanswered planner question must not |
| 1959 | // erase the turn from the persisted executor session. |
| 1960 | func TestCoordinatorPersistsUnansweredDecisionTurnToExecutorSession(t *testing.T) { |
| 1961 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1962 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Plan draft.\n<planner-ask>\nquestion: Which database?\noption: sqlite\noption: postgres\n</planner-ask>"}, |
| 1963 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1964 | }} |
| 1965 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1966 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "should not run"}, |
| 1967 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 1968 | }} |
| 1969 | sink := &recordSink{} |
| 1970 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, sink) |
| 1971 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, sink, nil) |
| 1972 | gate := &coordinatorDecisionGate{answer: ""} |
| 1973 | coord.SetPlannerUserDecisionAsker(gate) |
| 1974 | |
| 1975 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "set up storage"); err != nil { |
| 1976 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 1977 | } |
| 1978 | if gate.calls != 1 { |
| 1979 | t.Fatalf("decision gate calls = %d, want 1", gate.calls) |
| 1980 | } |
| 1981 | if len(exec.requests) != 0 { |
| 1982 | t.Fatal("executor must not run without a user answer") |
| 1983 | } |
| 1984 | msgs := executor.session.Messages |
| 1985 | if len(msgs) < 2 { |
| 1986 | t.Fatalf("executor session messages = %d, want the unanswered turn persisted", len(msgs)) |
| 1987 | } |
| 1988 | last := msgs[len(msgs)-1] |
| 1989 | if last.Role != provider.RoleAssistant || !strings.Contains(last.Content, plannerDecisionUnansweredNote) { |
| 1990 | t.Fatalf("last executor message = %q, want plan with unanswered-decision note", last.Content) |
| 1991 | } |
| 1992 | } |
| 1993 | |
| 1994 | // TestCoordinatorSkipsApprovalGateForNegatedApprovalWording pins the negation |
| 1995 | // veto: a plan that explicitly rules out an approval round must hand off |
| 1996 | // directly instead of raising a needless approval prompt. |
| 1997 | func TestCoordinatorSkipsApprovalGateForNegatedApprovalWording(t *testing.T) { |
| 1998 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 1999 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Plan:\n1. 修改 config.go\n2. 无需等待用户批准,直接执行修改"}, |
| 2000 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 2001 | }} |
| 2002 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 2003 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 2004 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 2005 | }} |
| 2006 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 2007 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 2008 | gate := &coordinatorApprovalGate{allow: false} |
| 2009 | coord.SetPlannerPlanApprover(gate) |
| 2010 | |
| 2011 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "tweak config"); err != nil { |
| 2012 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 2013 | } |
| 2014 | if gate.calls != 0 { |
| 2015 | t.Fatalf("approval gate calls = %d, want 0 for negated approval wording", gate.calls) |
| 2016 | } |
| 2017 | if len(exec.requests) == 0 { |
| 2018 | t.Fatal("executor should run directly for negated approval wording") |
| 2019 | } |
| 2020 | } |
| 2021 | |
| 2022 | // TestCoordinatorDoesNotAskForTargetConfirmationWording pins the pruned |
| 2023 | // decision phrases: ordinary verification wording such as "确认目标行为不变" |
| 2024 | // must not conjure an ask dialog. |
| 2025 | func TestCoordinatorDoesNotAskForTargetConfirmationWording(t *testing.T) { |
| 2026 | planner := &mockProvider{name: "planner", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 2027 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Plan:\n1. 修改 handler.go\n2. 运行测试确认目标行为不变\n3. 更新用户选择器组件"}, |
| 2028 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 2029 | }} |
| 2030 | exec := &mockProvider{name: "executor", chunks: []provider.Chunk{ |
| 2031 | {Type: provider.ChunkText, Text: "Done."}, |
| 2032 | {Type: provider.ChunkDone}, |
| 2033 | }} |
| 2034 | executor := New(exec, tool.NewRegistry(), NewSession("exec-sys"), Options{}, event.Discard) |
| 2035 | coord := NewCoordinator(planner, NewSession("planner-sys"), nil, nil, Options{}, executor, 0, event.Discard, nil) |
| 2036 | gate := &coordinatorDecisionGate{answer: "should not be used"} |
| 2037 | coord.SetPlannerUserDecisionAsker(gate) |
| 2038 | |
| 2039 | if err := coord.Run(context.Background(), "refactor handler"); err != nil { |
| 2040 | t.Fatalf("Run: %v", err) |
| 2041 | } |
| 2042 | if gate.calls != 0 { |
| 2043 | t.Fatalf("decision gate calls = %d, want 0 for ordinary verification wording", gate.calls) |
| 2044 | } |
| 2045 | if len(exec.requests) == 0 { |
| 2046 | t.Fatal("executor should run for ordinary plan wording") |
| 2047 | } |
| 2048 | } |
| 2049 |